10 results found
Searchresult 1 - 10 of 10. You filter by “Court rulings”.
-
Court rules on fine ACM imposed on debt collection agency Credit Invest
The court largely upheld ACM’s fine on debt collector Credit Invest, which exerted pressure on consumers to pay bills for invalid agreements. It failed to answer questions of consumers about their bills.
-
Highest court in the Netherlands confirms: KPN’s network to remain open
Highest court (CBb) in the Netherlands has confirmed on 17 July 2017 that KPN’s network is to remain open
-
District Court’s ruling on fine on Corendon for displaying prices incorrectly
On June 22, 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam upheld ACM’s fining decision against Corendon for displaying prices incorrectly.
-
District Court of Rotterdam rules in spam case
ACM correctly imposed fines on Daisycon for violation of the spam prohibition. However, the District Court did lower the fine.
-
District Court of Rotterdam rules in appeal of municipal pawnshops
The District Court of Rotterdam overturned ACM’s decisions with binding instructions on municipal pawnshops regarding pawn contracts.
-
District Court of Rotterdam rules in net neutrality case
Charging consumers different tariffs for services on the Internet (tariff differentiation) is a violation of Dutch net-neutrality regulations.
-
District Court of Rotterdam rules in silverskin onion cartel
Fines for single infringement between 1998-2011 were correct (area restriction, buying competitors, exchanging price information). Fine was based on EU turnover.
-
Highest court in antitrust matters upholds OPTA's television ruling
-
District court upholds OPTA’s spam fine
Recently the district court of Rotterdam announced its decision regarding a fine of EUR 75,000 imposed on a spammer by OPTA’s Commission. OPTA stated the spammer’s objection against the fine to be unfounded, after which the spammer lodged an appeal...
-
Court case concerning the provision of information to consumers - Mediafax
This case has been brought by KPN, because it is of the opinion that the information which OPTA provides to consumers is misleading.